In plain English I will try and illuminate the world of dog law in relation to my professionally and work with dogs.
I was walking down a street when a Jack Russell Terrier raced out of a house and attacked my leg. This occurred when I started out as young policemen on foot patrol in Cheshire many years ago, avoiding the Jack Russell’s flashing teeth meant I came to no harm other than an adrenalin boost and a wobbly helmet. I immediately prosecuted the owner under the old Dogs act 1871 and the owner received a warning and a small fine.
I am more than ever involved in litigation civil and criminal and mainly engaged for the defence of canines due to the Dangerous Dogs Act of 1991. However the noise abatement act is a frequent interloper in my professional court case work which can be complex and strange in its proportions of conflict.
In addition assessing the tracking abilities of Police Dogs in criminal prosecutions relating to burglaries/theft is also in demand. Dogs biting people in public places is also a regular case note file that lands on my desk notwithstanding cases re the prescribed breeds section under the DDA.
On the bizarre side a woman who claimed her son was being accused of having sex with his family dog by his wife.
A Lawyer recently contacted me stating that his clients’ case was most urgent and their dog needed immediate assessment. A few days later at my centre, in walked a beautiful Staffordshire Bull Terrier named Buzz with his owner Mr Jenkins and in regard it’s aberrant behaviour. The story in brief is that whilst Buzz was out being walked, he grabbed a ladies leg and bit into it, causing her to fall over. The incident was reported to the Police and the crown prosecution service summonsed the owners to court under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.
Other cases this year have included:
- A Labrador’s owner prosecuted under the Noise Abatement act that cost him £5000 in fines plus court costs.
- A client whose goat was attacked by a neighbours’ Great Dane and I acted as an arbitrator – this case has now transferred to the civil courts for damages.
- A case of a corgi that bit a Policeman in a public park and the owner being an actor who did not desire such negative publicity.
- A rape case where I have been called to give evidence for the defendant accused of the rape and I opinionated on a Police dogs’ tracking ability being good or bad evidence. This also saw me receiving an unusual case whereby a person was murdered whilst out with their dogs and the Barrister in question is requiring my knowledge of, specific breed behaviours, pack disruption and consequences of such traumatic circumstances.
My Police background and expertise in canine behaviour and psychology, criminal law and conducting investigations and evidence gathering allows me to undertake complex cases which I thoroughly enjoy. Giving evidence in court is essential if one is to represent clients professionally and with competence.
But, first back to Buzz, the mongrel and the order of procedure.
The lawyer representing the client contacts me and discusses the case and ascertains the likelihood of my evidence helping him defend his client and their dog. The client duly arrives at the centre knowing that my opinion may be the deciding factor in their defence. They are often tense, emotionally exhausted and look to me for hope. Their dog means a great deal to them otherwise, they would not spend so much money on counsel and general defence costs.
When the Jenkins arrived I filmed them on my centre camera network, how they managed their dog out of the car and particularly what control they had over the dog in the consulting room. Within minutes one can quite accurately determine owner/dog relationships.
The lawyer had already sent me the summary of case facts, statements from two Police officers, and a nurse who tended the injured complainant, Mr Jenkins statement and other related evidence/paper work. I had built up a full picture in my minds eye of what happened before we began the consultation. With the clients permission I video taped the entire three hour session. I then as I would have done as a police officer asked the client to relate the entire incident to me step by step, I only interrupt to maintain continuity or to exact more pertinent detailed evidence.
I then mentally re visit the scene and clarify every single fact I feel is critical to the defences case and the dog’s behaviour. At the same time I have noted much interplay between Buzz and his owner. I have also surreptitiously executed actions and gestures to observe Buzz’s aggressive trigger reactions further helping my behavioural assessment.
The next phase is to test the dog’s temperament which takes place in the consulting rooms and outside in the centre gardens which are especially designed for such tests away from the public gaze using highly skilled dog trainers.
The most important part of being an expert witness is having the skills to write precise, usable evidence and that’s were many experts in dog behaviour fail, only law training can produce that skill.
What you write often more or less determines the court outcome. Poor evidence compilation can and does destroy a very defensible case. Remember, in court a very skilled counsel will pick over your every word and innuendo. They may have somebody equal to you as their expert representing the prosecution and to counter your opinion.
Knowing the rules of evidence writing and being able to construct such evidence is not optional, it takes years of practice. Some lawyers will help you, but if you are not careful it can back fire. When you are in the witness box you are on your own and what you wrote is what you are judged on.
Appearing In court
Most witnesses will agree that appearing in a court is a very nerve racking experience with little to commend itself. I cannot in this article enter into much description other than to state that as an expert witness, you need to perform, and yes it is a performance, in a calm unemotional and authoritative manner; not always easy when counsel for the prosecution or defence is determined to destroy your credibility. I have met some fellow experts who declared not to ever enter a court again having been humiliated and embarrassed at their first appearance. You can read more about being an expert witness.
I recently had a rough time with a judge in court but after a breath its simply sharpened me up for the next case I deal with and experience is gleaned once again.
Barking to the point of being a nuisance
Rob Johnson is the owner of the Labrador I alluded to earlier named Pippa. Unfortunately for Rob, Pippa is a yapper, howler and generally a noisy dog. The behaviour is episodic, but Rob lives in North London in a typical suburban road. The dog is cared for reasonably well, walked regularly, a part of Pippa’s daily routine is being left in the outside garden in good weather and with accommodation for a few hours each day. Rob works from home so spends lots of time with Pippa. Local people have complained about Pippa’s barking – to the council, not Rob.
Evidence compiled by a council dog warden and other officials who stood outside Rob’s home, including audio taping his dog barking, landed Rob in the court under the Noise Abatement Act. Rob asked me to opinionate on whether his dog barks to the point of being a nuisance. Rob had filmed Pippa over two weeks and handed me the tapes, a lot of tapes, to view.
It was immediately obvious to me from the tapes that Pippa was barking because of a mild fear base, rather than aimless bored barking. Even so the total amount of barking per day never exceeded about 15 minutes in total. I pointed out to Rob that though I could make suggestions to reduce the barking, the prime cause was a defective temperament and that Pippa’s barking was exaggerated alert barking to general local sounds. He applied my behavioural remedy suggestions immediately.
I wrote a statement for court but the council brought along an army of officials and Rob could not afford my costs to appear. He also was so angered by the pettiness of the officials – he wanted to defend himself and show his weeks of work tape evidence. Rob later told me that the magistrates seemed to have made their mind up before he spoke. He was found guilty and the magistrates fined Rob £5000.00 including costs. This to me was not justice; because if Rob had been wealthy he probably would have been able to fight the case more robustly. The council used rate payers’ money for their action.
What determines a noisy dog is arbitrary so it’s important to address the barking problem before your neighbours do.
During last summer, Ross one of my colleagues came to my office saying that a lawyer was on the phone with an unusual request regarding a criminal case of rape. Even I raised an eye brow as how that would require my doggy skills. The lawyer quickly acquainted me with a case summary. A woman raped, the defendant who lives six houses from her is in custody and awaiting trial.
The lawyer said that a component part of the prosecutions case was police dog handler’s evidence which stated that he arrived at the scene and tracked from the victims house (a hard track on road) to the defendant’s house. The lawyers question was; is that possible? I examined all the available evidence and concluded that this scenario was very much in doubt and needed challenging. At the trial other evidence unbeknown to me at the time of my evidence compilation was used – the defendant was found guilty on more substantial evidence including leaving a shoe in the victims bedroom – bit of a giveaway really.
Many people believe all dogs should be automatic euthanasia having bitten; even some veterinarians voice this opinion. In my view this extremism is amoral and often based on ignorance or the vet wishing to place themselves out of harms way if matters go wrong. I don’t think that society should accommodate truly dangerous dogs, but understanding that dog aggression, growling, nipping, biting and barking is a dog’s natural species behaviour to communicate its mood to its own kind and to us. Our job is to moderate, condition and minimise possible conflict which in most cases we do with 6 million dogs. Remember everything we expose domestic dogs to is unnatural, dog training is unnatural, living in a house is alien to a dog. Its genetic make up is designed to live in a natural landscape devoid of human interference – despite the changes we impose it is still the most wonderful creature to be successfully brought into our homes out of the kingdom of animals.
As an aside; if we take a peep into human aggression, conflict & behaviour in the UK we certainly are not a paragon of civility and good behaviour. The BBC web site records 22.000 knife crimes last year alone. Tens of thousands of people attacked violent yearly by their own kind and hundreds murdered.
Dogs, it seems can, and do, bite, but are not as dangerous as our fellow man. The irony of the matter is that dogs don’t realise what they do, offends us or the law – people do.